What National Farm Policy Trends Could Mean for Efforts to Update WTO Rules on Domestic Support
- This report makes the case that World Trade Organization (WTO) rules on agricultural domestic support urgently need to be updated in order to help foster more equitable, sustainable, and efficient markets and contribute to progress on Agenda 2030.
- It compares trends in farm support policies over time across a dozen WTO members, examines how they relate to existing ceilings on support at the global trade body, and identifies possible ways forward.
- The authors set out recommendations on how WTO members could simplify domestic support rules in the future and makes the case for greater transparency in government notifications.
Global trade rules on the support governments can provide to their farm sectors need urgent reform if countries are to make progress on Agenda 2030—and in particular on Sustainable Development Goal 2, which aims to end hunger and malnutrition, achieve food security, and promote sustainable agriculture. Trade rules must balance the need to ensure that domestic support does not harm producers elsewhere with the need to increase public investment in agriculture and food systems. With the coronavirus pandemic and climate-related volatility affecting global markets, improved rules on domestic support would also help improve stability and predictability in the global food system.
This report looks in detail at agricultural support in a cross-section of the World Trade Organization (WTO) membership. It examines how this support relates to public policy goals, the type of domestic support instruments chosen, and countries’ current WTO limits on support.
It proposes simplifying domestic support rules by allowing countries to provide a certain minimal level of trade-distorting support based on a percentage of the value of production. It also makes the case for much stronger transparency requirements on government notifications. Specifically, the report recommends:
- New overall limits on domestic support that can harm producers in other countries, which are gradually cut over time. The aim is to redress inequalities among countries and harmonize support levels in the future. The new limits would be tied to an objective measurement of support as a share of agricultural output that reflects current market and policy realities, rather than using fixed levels that reflect past support.
- By providing special and differential treatment to developing countries that require it, negotiators would provide those WTO members with a longer phase-in period, a higher initial cap, or both.
- Limits on how much support can be focused on any one commodity, including agreement on product categories.
- Food bought at administered prices fixed by governments under public stockholding programs will not count toward domestic support limits when the administered price is below an agreed international market price.
You might also be interested in
World Trade Organization Talks on Agricultural Subsidies Should Consider Trade-Offs Among Trade, Food Security, and the Environment
Facundo Calvo, agricultural policy analyst for IISD, discusses the WTO’s approach to agricultural subsidies from a trade, food security, and an environmental perspective.
Global Food Crisis May Take Centre Stage at MC12 Agriculture Negotiations
IISD’s Facundo Calvo discusses the implications of the global food security crisis for agricultural negotiations at the WTO’s 12th Ministerial Conference.
Why we must rethink the use of nitrogen fertilizers
As policy-makers weigh how to respond to the war in Ukraine and the related humanitarian crisis, a crucial consideration is how they can prevent a burgeoning hunger crisis from spiraling out of control.
Overcoming the Threats to Global Food Systems from Russia's Invasion of Ukraine
Shocks and crises have become the new norm, which calls for a fundamental reconsideration of how food is produced, traded, and consumed.