Regional Food Security and Trade Policy in Southeast Asia: The Role of ASEAN
The achievement of food security and the promotion of open trade are two of the key challenges the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) faces. The 2007/08 food crisis had sparked wider debates about the relationship between the two variables, and the extent to which the existing trade policies of the Association are detrimental to the promotion of food security in the region, and vice-versa. While the global food crisis did not necessarily hamper regional trade, the ways in which individual nations responded to the crisis were not only detrimental to the promotion of regional food trade, but also to the overall open economic commitment of the region vis-à-vis the world market.
Key findings:
There is still a major discrepancy between the aspiration of ASEAN to remain as an open economic regional grouping and its member countries' insistence on maintaining the protection of their food markets;
The 2007/08 global food crisis proved to be a strong test case for ASEAN solidarity with key rice-producing countries in the region choosing to supply the global food needs at the expense of fulfilling the need of food supplies in other ASEAN member countries;
Another concern that jeopardized ASEAN's overall solidarity was the initiative by some key rice-exporting nations to set up the so-called Organization for Rice Exporting Countries (OREC). While it is not clear as to whether OREC would turn into an agricultural cartel similar to that of Organization for Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), the idea was nevertheless seen as a political threat that could potentially hamper further cooperation in the region.
As the grouping integrates further and moves towards its plan to establish an ASEAN Community in 2015, there is an impending need for each member country to review its food security and trade priorities. Despite the diverse capacity of ASEAN member countries to produce food, food insecurity is a regional problem that is best tackled with a regional approach.
Key recommendations:
Implement national food security policies that are in line with the spirit of ASEAN regionalism;
Make use of, improve and expand the existing food security mechanisms in ASEAN and beyond, particularly some of the more recent initiatives, such as the ASEAN Integrated Food Security (AIFS) and its corresponding Strategic Plan of Action for Food Security (SPA-FS), as well as others within the ASEAN plus Three framework, including the ASEAN Food Security Information System (AFSIS) and the East Asian Emergency Rice Reserve (EAERR);
Coordinate better to reduce trade and food security policy discrepancies at both national and regional levels; and
Put relevant social safety nets in place and work with relevant non-state stakeholders to minimize the adverse impacts of open food trade regimes.
You might also be interested in
Insights on Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification in Carbon Pricing
How governments can design monitoring, reporting, and verification systems that make carbon pricing credible, workable, and inclusive.
Making Electric Vehicles Work for More People
At least seven of the 21 BRICS+ economies are directing subsidies toward electric vehicles (EVs) and transport services widely used by lower- and middle-income people—from two- and three-wheelers to buses and shared transport.
Sustainable and Resilient Value Chains: Gender Equality
How voluntary sustainability standards and private sector actors can advance gender equality and women's economic empowerment in agricultural value chains.
August 2026 | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
When IISD launched Carbon Minefields, we aimed to make the continued expansion of oil and gas production more visible and measurable.