Measuring the Performance and Impact of Community Indicators Systems: Insights on frameworks and examples of key performance indicators
Community indicator systems (CISs) are growing in number across North America, Europe, and Australia in an effort to improve evidence-based decision-making in government, business, and civil society.
By providing open access to data and information on community well-being, CISs generally aim to build the knowledge and capacity of communities to work together to improve well-being. However, there is currently a dearth of research on the extent to which CISs are achieving positive impacts on community well-being. Similarly, the research on monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems and best practices of CISs is limited. Hence, CISs currently have few resources to which they can turn to design and improve upon their evaluative practices and overall program performance.
This exploratory study addresses this research gap on the M&E practices and procedures in use by CISs, asking: What key performance indicators are CISs using to measure program outcomes and impacts on the community?
You might also be interested in
A Measure of Care
As countries consider how to move beyond GDP in better measuring prosperity, this report explores how to ensure the unpaid labour of women is counted.
State of Global Environmental Governance 2025
Analysis of the wins and setbacks in international environmental negotiations in 2025 amid unprecedented challenges to multilateralism.
IISD’s Best of 2025: Publications
As 2025 draws to a close, we’re revisiting our most downloaded publications of the year.
Over a Decade of Protecting the World's Fresh Water: Five ways IISD Experimental Lakes Area has made a difference
The Experimental Lakes Area has been transformed ever since IISD saved it from imminent closure. But, don’t just take our word for it. Here are five stories from people who have seen, firsthand, the impact of IISD-ELA over the last decade.