Maintenance of Hydropower Potential in Rwanda Through Ecosystem Restoration
Secure energy access through hydroelectric power production is critical to Rwanda's efforts to achieve its economic development and poverty reduction goals.
However, the country's reliance on hydropower production also leaves it vulnerable to changing hydrological conditions potentially caused by a variety of factors. This vulnerability was demonstrated in the mid-2000s when Rwanda experienced an energy crisis that adversely affected its development prospects. This crisis was spurred in large measure by a steep decline in reservoir water levels at two of the country's largest hydropower stations, leading to a significant drop in electricity production. This decline in water levels was precipitated by a combination of factors, including poor management of an upstream wetland, degradation of the surrounding watershed due to human activity, poor maintenance of the station and reduced precipitation in the preceding years.
In response to this crisis, the Government of Rwanda sought to restore the degraded watershed through a combination of actions at the policy and field levels. It also spurred Rwanda to diversify its energy portfolio with support from the private sector. This case study discusses the actions that were taken and their impact on rural livelihoods and the sustainability of the country's electricity sector. It demonstrates the need for diverse approaches to addressing complex problems and, in particular, the importance of integrated watershed management in promoting energy security and helping to reduce vulnerability to future climate change.
The case study Maintenance of Hydropower Potential in Rwanda Through Ecosystem Restoration was prepared for and published in the 2010-2011 World Resources Report.
You might also be interested in
Fossil fuel extraction must be stopped to limit global warming
New research published in the journal Environmental Research Letters emphasizes the urgency of climate change. The study shows that stopping new oil, gas and coal development isn’t enough. To avoid going over the 1.5°C temperature change limit, not only do new fossil fuel extraction projects need to be stopped, but some existing and approved projects must also be decommissioned.
Mining and drilling outside Russia is 'not a viable response' to Ukraine war, climate scientists say
It is now clear that keeping fossil fuels in the ground is the single biggest factor in whether we keep global temperatures below pre-industrial levels- or below 1.5C as it is often referred to. But a new study shows that this means more than just not mining or drilling at new sites.
Study warns developed fossil fuel reserves will need to shut to meet 1.5C limit
Stopping new oil, gas and coal developments is not enough to limit dangerous global warming – existing sites will also need to be shut down, a study warns.
No hay salida sostenible con combustible fósil a la crisis por Ucrania (in Spanish)
Dejar de desarrollar nuevos proyectos de petróleo, gas y carbón no es suficiente: las instalaciones de extracción ya construidas deben ser clausuradas prematuramente para contener el calentamiento global.