Modest Modernization or Massive Setback?
An analysis of the Energy Charter Treaty agreement in principle
-
Reforms to the Energy Charter Treaty are too modest, too piecemeal, and too untested to transform the Treaty into an instrument that is compatible with the global climate agenda and states’ energy transition goals.
-
In the EU and UK, existing fossil fuel investments will continue to enjoy ECT protection for at least 10 more years—a length of time at odds with current knowledge on the speed of fossil fuel phase-out required to limit global warming to 1.5°C.
-
Existing and new fossil fuel investments could continue to be covered indefinitely in almost all ECT parties other than the UK and EU.
The paper explains both the changes outlined in the Communication and identifies key areas where no change has been indicated, with a view to examining how the revised ECT text will impact the critical objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
The analysis concludes that, while the changes address some of the problems inherent in old generation investment treaties, the reforms are too modest, too piecemeal, and too untested to transform the ECT into an instrument that is compatible with the global climate agenda and states’ energy transition goals.
You might also be interested in
Newly Released Text for Modernized Energy Charter Treaty Shows Too Many Potential Obstacles for Climate Action
The text of the agreement in principle to modernize the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) leaves unanswered too many crucial questions about the possibility of further fossil fuel carveouts and the exact timing of its entry into force—key factors that will determine its climate impact.
EXPLAINER-Obscure energy treaty threatens huge state losses over climate action
British oil and gas company Rockhopper has won more than £210 million ($245 million) in a lawsuit over Italy’s ban on offshore drilling, fuelling concern among climate experts about the impact of a controversial energy treaty used to bring the claim.
Uniper drops coal case as tensions rise over treaty on fossil fuel projects
German energy company Uniper has been forced by its government to drop a lawsuit against the Netherlands over the proposed closure of coal power plants, highlighting the tensions over a treaty protecting fossil fuel projects.
Oil Companies Are Suing to Block Climate Action – With 72% Success
Fossil fuel investors are adopting a bold new legal tactic in response to efforts to limit global warming: they are going to private international tribunals to argue that climate change policies are illegally cutting into their profits and they must therefore be compensated. Now governments are scrambling to figure out how to not get sued for billions when enacting climate policies.