A Critical Opportunity for Transparency in Investor-State Disputes as Government Delegations and Arbitration Experts Meet in New York
Country delegations to the United Nations have a critical opportunity to bring much-needed transparency to international arbitrations between foreign investors and host governments in discussions to be held on February 6-10, 2012 in New York.
In 2008, it looked as though the arbitration rules developed in 1976 by a United Nations body, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), might be revised to address the lack of transparency in arbitration proceedings under the rules. Many developing (and several developed) states stressed the importance of increasing transparency, which led to a decision by UNCITRAL member governments to prepare a legal standard to ensure transparency in investor-state arbitrations. The Working Group on International Arbitration and Conciliation of country delegations was mandated to create the new rules.
Four years later, the Working Group is close to finalizing its work on a set of new arbitration rules on transparency. Unfortunately, there is a great risk that some delegations will try to impede true progress by adopting superficially improved rules on transparency but ensuring that they will not be applied in practice.
You might also be interested in
Decoding the Belt and Road Initiative’s Legal Architecture
This article unpacks the Belt and Road Initiative's legal architecture—covering hard law (such as treaties and contracts), soft law (such as memoranda of understanding), and the unique role of China's state-owned enterprises—and sets out recommendations for host country policy-makers on how to navigate this hybrid legal environment.
What Happened in Santa Marta?
What happened at the first international conference on transitioning away from fossil fuels? IISD experts share 7 takeaways and discuss what comes next.
Tax Incentives in National Investment Laws
This report maps the design, legal structure, and governance arrangements of tax incentives across 105 national investment laws to support better coordination among the institutions that shape these policies and help countries attract quality investment.
Understanding Investor–State Dispute Settlement in the Mining Sector
This brief introduces investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) for mining policy-makers and shows how understanding it helps governments design clearer rules, manage permits and contracts, prevent costly disputes, and protect policy spaces while maintaining a predictable investment climate.