Contracts for Sustainable Infrastructure: Ensuring the economic, social and environmental co-benefits of infrastructure investment projects
Infrastructure—including transportation, electricity, telecommunications, water and sanitation—is essential to the achievement of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and to the success of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.
However, to achieve the SDGs and address climate change, the infrastructure to be upgraded and built must be sustainable—it must be specifically designed to mitigate economic, social and environmental risks, and to generate economic, social and environmental co-benefits.
Public–private partnerships (PPPs) are among the modes that government may adopt to structure infrastructure projects. The PPP contract forms a significant part of the normative framework governing the relationship between the government and the investor, allocating responsibilities and risks. For PPPs to lead to the development of sustainable infrastructure, governments and private parties must ensure that sustainability criteria are embedded in the project from its inception and appropriately reflected in the PPP contract.
The 2017 edition of the World Bank Group’s Guidance on PPP Contractual Provisions presents sample contract language that governments may adopt for PPPs. However, as pointed out by Foley Hoag LLP, the guidance frequently offers advice that restrains government measures aimed at achieving the SDGs, and misses an opportunity to consider how infrastructure projects can contribute to sustainable development.
Complementing the analysis by Foley Hoag LLP, this report seizes the opportunity missed by the World Bank Group’s guidance. Bridging IISD’s experience in public procurement and infrastructure finance and investment, it defines sustainable infrastructure, outlines its expected characteristics and co-benefits, and presents why governments must and how they can integrate sustainability into infrastructure contracts.
You might also be interested in
Guidebook on the Management and Financing of Soil Rehabilitation Projects in China
Drawing on best practices worldwide in funding environmental rehabilitation, this guidebook explores innovative design and the use of financial mechanisms to finance and manage soil remediation projects.
Deal for Modernized Energy Charter Treaty Insufficient for Ambitious Climate Action
The new "agreement in principle" for a modernized Energy Charter Treaty falls short of pledges to make the trade and investment deal better suited to achieving international climate goals, IISD experts say.
Oil Companies Are Suing to Block Climate Action – With 72% Success
Fossil fuel investors are adopting a bold new legal tactic in response to efforts to limit global warming: they are going to private international tribunals to argue that climate change policies are illegally cutting into their profits and they must therefore be compensated. Now governments are scrambling to figure out how to not get sued for billions when enacting climate policies.
Approaches of International Courts and Tribunals to the Award of Compensation in International Private Property Cases and Implications for the Reform of Investor-State Arbitration
This report compares approaches used to award compensation in international courts and tribunals to inform reform processes that address the negative impacts of investment treaties.