Doha Round Briefing Series - Issue 8 of 13 - Review of the Dispute Settlement Understanding
The eighth of a series prepared by the International Institute for Sustainable Development and the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Among the Uruguay Round's final documents, a 1994 Ministerial Decision agreed to a "full review of dispute settlement rules and procedures under the World Trade Organisation within four years after the entry into force of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organisation." Ministers further agreed to "take a decision on the occasion of [their] first meeting after the completion of the review, whether to continue, modify or terminate such dispute settlement rules and procedures." Members agreed to complete the review by 1 January 1999, which was later extended to 31 January 1999. The exercise yielded no concrete conclusions, however, and the review languished in an inconclusive limbo until ministers agreed in Doha to "improve and clarify" the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU). These negotiations have been taking place in special sessions of the Dispute Settlement Body since March 2002 (DSB).
You might also be interested in
Through Their Eyes
Across Belize, women, young people, and other underrepresented groups are documenting how climate change is affecting their communities and how they are responding. Through mobile photography and storytelling, participants in the Climate Adaptation and Protected Areas (CAPA) Initiative’s storytelling project are sharing their experiences in their own words, offering a personal look at resilience and adaptation in action.
A Guide to Guarantees for Sovereign Debtors
A guide to deploying sovereign guarantees to mobilize capital and support sustainable development while managing fiscal risks.
Managing Energy Price Crises
This report outlines a strategic decision framework policy-makers can use when responding to fossil fuel price shocks.
Preserving Tax Sovereignty
As countries negotiate the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, this report examines how its provisions can be shaped to prevent tax disputes from being redirected into ISDS, ensuring they are addressed through tax-specific mechanisms.