Peace, Conflict, and National Adaptation Plan Processes
Many conflict-affected states are also among the most vulnerable to climate change. The NAP process offers a chance to break this cycle.
Many conflict-affected states are also among the most vulnerable to #ClimateChange. The NAP process offers an opportunity to break this cycle. Learn more in our new guidance note.
#ClimateChange adaptation and peacebuilding go hand in hand. Our report provides strategic steps to kickstart climate adaptation planning in a way that responds to peace & conflict dynamics.
How can conflict-affected countries make links between #ClimateChange adaptation plans and peacebuilding as they grapple with pressing issues? Learn more about this crucial intersection here.
For states experiencing conflict, climate change adaptation is rarely, if ever, an immediate priority: issues such as national defence, the prevention of further loss of life and suffering, and the establishment of peace take precedence. In countries recovering from conflict and violence, where peace—however fragile—has been established, governments are often faced with the difficult, lengthy, and complex task of strengthening and rebuilding the governance mechanisms and institutions required to meet the immediate needs of their population and to protect them from a host of risks, including the return of violence. As in situations of active conflict, prioritizing climate change action in peacebuilding contexts can be difficult.
However, the close links between climate change and fragility mean that it would be a mistake to ignore medium- and long-term adaptation needs in these peacebuilding contexts.
This guidance note examines how governments operating in peacebuilding contexts can initiate, finance, implement, monitor, evaluate, and learn from their NAP process in a way that understands and responds to peace and conflict dynamics. The resulting conflict-sensitive NAPs are aligned with a country’s peacebuilding and development objectives, actively promote peace, and work to minimize the risks that climate change and adaptation programming will contribute to conflict. The guidance note’s three primary objectives are as follows:
- to outline the enabling factors required to design conflict-sensitive NAPs, namely leadership; data, knowledge, and communications; financing; institutional arrangements; stakeholder engagement; and skills and capacities;
- to offer practical entry points to design NAP processes whose main phases are aligned with peacebuilding objectives;
- to provide examples of how countries are integrating conflict and peacebuilding considerations into their NAP processes.
You might also be interested in
National State of the Environment Report: Uzbekistan
The National State of the Environment Report (NSoER) is a comprehensive document that provides a snapshot of current environmental trends in Uzbekistan's socio-economic development for citizens, experts, and policy-makers in the country of Uzbekistan.
Ottawa supports Big Oil over the climate
One can only imagine the positive buzz these days inside the boardrooms of Canada's oil companies, as they rake in record profits and plan major expansions of their oil production. Amid all the good cheer, one could easily lose sight of the fact that those plans will push the world dangerously closer to the brink of irreversible climate chaos. Even as the world finally signed a commitment at UN climate talks last month to begin transitioning away from fossil fuels, Canada's major oil companies are poised to do exactly the opposite — to greatly expand their fossil fuel production.
'Car without wheels': Adaptation playbook lacks finance target
Governments at the COP 28 climate talks in Dubai have agreed on a playbook for adapting to climate change in areas like health, protecting nature and food and water security. But while wealthy countries celebrated the agreement, developing and particularly African countries denounced the absence of a target to provide financial and other forms of support.
Rich countries need to pay Global South at least US$209 billion annually to phase out fossil fuels: report
The United States and European Union have to deliver the bulk of the amount, as they have greater capacity and responsibility to do so, says the Civil Society Equity Review, a new study released at the COP28 climate summit.