Submission to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development on Investment Agreements and Climate Change
Investment law and policy can play a significant role in either addressing—or exacerbating—some of the world’s greatest challenges, from climate change to inequality. In light of this, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has developed a work programme on “The Future of Investment Treaties,” which recognizes the need to reshape investment treaties so they facilitate rather than impede progress toward tackling these challenges.
As part of this work, OECD launched a public consultation in early 2022 to gather views from a wide range of stakeholders on how policy-makers can redesign investment treaties and policies in response to the escalating climate crisis. Government representatives will discuss the submissions received at the 7th annual OECD Investment Treaty Conference on May 10, 2022.
IISD worked in partnership with ClientEarth and the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) to respond to the consultation. Our submission outlines some of the major conflicts that exist between investment law and environmental regulations, including how priority given to investment protection in arbitral tribunals can discourage countries from pursuing ambitious environmental measures. It also details the main barriers to change in the investment treaty regime, such as a lack of coherence and consensus on how reform efforts should proceed. Finally, it proposes a series of policy recommendations aimed at coordinating reform efforts and reconciling climate and investment objectives.
You might also be interested in
Oil Companies Are Suing to Block Climate Action – With 72% Success
Fossil fuel investors are adopting a bold new legal tactic in response to efforts to limit global warming: they are going to private international tribunals to argue that climate change policies are illegally cutting into their profits and they must therefore be compensated. Now governments are scrambling to figure out how to not get sued for billions when enacting climate policies.
Governments' Climate Laws Could Spur $340B In ISDS Claims
As governments consider how and when to enact legislation or mitigation measures meant to address climate change, a study shows there is a pricey cause for concern as fossil fuel companies could bring legal claims worth billions of dollars against them in order to protect their assets.
The fossil fuel industry has a trillion-dollar secret weapon to kneecap climate action
On his first day in office, President Joe Biden revoked the permit for the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline, which would have brought exceptionally dirty oil south from Canada across the Plains. The project’s owner, Calgary-based TC Energy, saw billions in future profits go up in smoke. So it turned to an arcane but potentially explosive tool to try to recoup the loss, filing a claim under the now-defunct North American Free Trade Agreement. The company is seeking $15 billion.
Investor-state disputes threaten the global green energy transition
To limit global warming to below 1.5°C, governments will have to simultaneously curb demand for fossil fuels and limit supply. However, efforts to limit supply will affect asset holders, particularly in the upstream (exploration and production) and midstream (transportation and storage) portions of the supply chain.