Bill C-12 is an Essential Step Toward Net Zero
Today marks an important step forward by the Canadian government to entrench climate change action into law with legally binding emissions targets to get Canada to net zero by 2050. IISD commends the federal government as it joins other leading countries with similar legislation, including the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Germany, Sweden, and Denmark.
This sends a strong and much-needed signal to subnational governments, the private sector, and all Canadians that a transition to a net-zero economy is not only vital but already underway.
In particular, we applaud four strong elements:
- Enshrining a 2050 net-zero commitment into law.
- A well-defined management and accountability framework of five-year milestones, emission reduction plans, and transparent reporting requirements.
- An independent advisory body to ensure our climate plans are ambitious and informed by science.
- The new requirement to report on financial risks related to climate change across the federal government, guiding the “greening” of federal investments and providing clear signals to capital markets.
There’s work left to do to strengthen and support this accountability framework, including a new detailed plan to meet Canada’s 2030 target, sectoral pathways for our 2050 goals, a robust Just Transition Act, and a National Adaptation Plan.
As an accountability framework, the act does not include specific initiatives to get to net zero, such as the Green Industrial Revolution that Prime Minister Johnson called for in the United Kingdom’s 10-point plan earlier this week. Canada will need to move quickly to keep up, especially with the Biden climate plan taking shape in the United States. Our global obligations and international competitiveness are at stake.
But as governments across the globe face converging crises, Bill C-12 makes sure our climate goals are grounded in accountability and offers a stronger foundation on which to build a resilient recovery.
You might also be interested in
New Report Finds Carbon Capture And Storage Far Too Expensive
A new report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development found carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies to be very expensive in Canada. According to the report, which focuses on carbon capture in the context of Canada's oil and gas industry, the climate solution’s persistently high costs are rooted in the "high design complexity and the need for customization."
CCS Can't Compete with Renewables, Won't Deliver by 2030, Report Finds
Carbon capture and storage may have an important role to play in hard-to-decarbonize sectors like iron and steel, but won't pay off for oil and gas companies without continuing government subsidies, the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) concludes in an analysis released this week.
Report finds carbon capture's 'stubbornly high' prices are likely here to stay
Canada's oil and gas industry says costly technology it plans to use to reduce its climate footprint requires more investments from the federal government. If governments lend a hand now, the industry maintains the technology will become more affordable over time as more projects proceed, but a new analysis casts doubt on that claim. "Carbon capture and storage is expensive, and the costs are not likely to come down in the timeframe needed to meet our climate targets," said Laura Cameron, one of the report's three authors and a policy adviser for the International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Carbon capture projects are too costly, have ‘questionable’ benefits, report finds
Technology the oil industry is counting on to reduce emissions–carbon capture and storage–is too expensive and difficult to deploy quickly enough to help Canada meet its climate commitments, a global environmental think tank says. Relying on carbon capture and storage to cut greenhouse gases from oil and gas production will mean large public subsidies for projects that are unable to compete on costs against expanding renewable energy sources, rendering the benefits "questionable," the International Institute for Sustainable Development said in a report released Thursday.