Recycling for Cobalt, Lithium Low Despite Importance to Climate Change Fight
Despite clear environmental and economic benefits, lithium and cobalt recycling rates are low, says a study released by the International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Demand for minerals in electric vehicles, solar panels and wind turbines predicted to exceed supply this decade
OTTAWA, APRIL 3, 2019 – Extracting cobalt and lithium from old products and infrastructure is essential to heading off predicted metal shortfalls, empowering clean energy transitions and reducing risk of human exploitation.
Despite these benefits, lithium and cobalt recycling rates are low, says a study released by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
Sustainability and Second Life: The Case for Cobalt and Lithium Recycling notes interest in renewable technologies (such as electric vehicles, solar panels and wind turbines) has increased demand for cobalt and lithium. However, global supplies of both minerals are not projected to meet demand, with research forecasting shortfalls in the coming decade.
Recycling conducted in a responsible and transparent way could help head off these shortfalls while reducing pressure on mining communities vulnerable to exploitation. However, recycling rates remain low due to a lack of transparency in recycling supply chains; manufacturers purchasing substitute minerals due to high prices for raw cobalt and lithium; and inefficient collection of cobalt and lithium from existing infrastructure, to name a few.
“It’s a balance. We have to meet demand for a green energy shift while protecting human rights,” said Clare Church, Research Officer at IISD and lead author of the report. “Recycling can play a key role in achieving these goals, and we hope our study prompts action to drive those rates up.”
Sustainability and Second Life: The Case for Cobalt and Lithium Recycling’s recommendations include:
- Increased transparency and responsible sourcing along primary and recycling supply chains
- Enhancing the eco-design of products containing lithium and cobalt
- Raising consumer awareness regarding current collection and recycling schemes
- New or revised investments to improve collection infrastructure, technology development and knowledge creation
- Clearly designating the actors responsible and liable for recycling materials
“Recycling has long been a central tenet in circular business models and sustainable development,” said Church. “Adopting recycling in the mining sector and in supply chains is essential to ensure the transition to a low-carbon economy is responsible and sustainable for the longer term.”
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is a globally recognized think tank with 3 decades of experience working to solve the world’s most pressing sustainable development challenges. We combine deep expertise in a wide range of issues with a collaborative approach to research, policy advice, and hands-on support to ensure these solutions are brought to life. Headquartered in Winnipeg, Manitoba, we are a diverse team of over 300 professionals working from offices in Canada, Switzerland, and other locations around the world.
You might also be interested in
Carbon Pricing in the ASEAN Region: Moving from ambition to architecture
For ASEAN policy-makers, carbon pricing is no longer simply a domestic climate policy choice. It is increasingly linked to global economic integration, trade relationships, investment flows, and industrial competitiveness.
Navigating the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
A guide for exporters on navigating EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism costs and reporting from 2026 onward—with a focus on steel and aluminum.
Mapping Indonesia’s Battery Electric Vehicle Ecosystem
In a closed-door discussion under Chatham House Rules, policy-makers, industry players, and researchers explored Indonesia’s battery electric vehicle (EV) ecosystem and the policies shaping it.
Bonn Climate Talks: What to watch for the fossil fuel transition
As governments return to Bonn for the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies meetings (SB64), the transition away from fossil fuels will be a key test of whether growing political momentum can translate into practical progress.