International trade agreements provide opportunities for sustainable procurement in Canada
International trade agreements are not a barrier to innovative sustainable procurement, but procurers need to use the flexibility offered by these agreements instead of perceiving them as a barrier, according to a new study released today by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
Ottawa, 27 March – International trade agreements are not a barrier to innovative sustainable procurement, but procurers need to use the flexibility offered by these agreements instead of perceiving them as a barrier, according to a new study released today by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
Canada’s International Trade Obligations: Barrier or opportunity for sustainable public procurement? focuses on how and to what extent Canada’s international trade commitments enable the transition towards strategic public procurement. The report looks specifically at the World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Government Procurement (WTO GPA) and the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).
“Sustainable procurement is an important strategic tool that governments can use to drive towards a low-carbon economy,” says report author Liesbeth Casier, a Policy Analyst with IISD's Economic Law and Policy Program. “But procurers often cite the complexities of international trade agreements and other legal frameworks as a barrier to implementing sustainable procurement.”
The report – based on desk research and interviews with Canadian procurers, policy-makers and international experts – includes examples of how sustainable public procurement already happens in Canada and in other jurisdictions in a manner compliant with international economic law.
“Providing more legal certainty about what a procuring authority can do under international trade obligations is one way to address the barriers and enable better use of sustainable procurement,” Casier said.
The report includes recommendations to governments stakeholders, including the development of a Procurement Package. This would include:
- A Social Procurement Policy to accompany the already well-established Green Procurement Policy
- A one-stop shop for questions
- A learning and sharing platform
- Further professionalization of procurers
Other recommendations include:
- Acceleration of the development of a national database on life-cycle assessments
- Development of tools that value sustainability tailored to procurers
- Implementing sustainable e-procurement
- Innovation brokers to facilitate sustainable public procurement implementation
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is a globally recognized think tank with 3 decades of experience working to solve the world’s most pressing sustainable development challenges. We combine deep expertise in a wide range of issues with a collaborative approach to research, policy advice, and hands-on support to ensure these solutions are brought to life. Headquartered in Winnipeg, Manitoba, we are a diverse team of over 300 professionals working from offices in Canada, Switzerland, and other locations around the world.
You might also be interested in
Carbon Pricing in the ASEAN Region: Moving from ambition to architecture
For ASEAN policy-makers, carbon pricing is no longer simply a domestic climate policy choice. It is increasingly linked to global economic integration, trade relationships, investment flows, and industrial competitiveness.
Navigating the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
A guide for exporters on navigating EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism costs and reporting from 2026 onward—with a focus on steel and aluminum.
Mapping Indonesia’s Battery Electric Vehicle Ecosystem
In a closed-door discussion under Chatham House Rules, policy-makers, industry players, and researchers explored Indonesia’s battery electric vehicle (EV) ecosystem and the policies shaping it.
Bonn Climate Talks: What to watch for the fossil fuel transition
As governments return to Bonn for the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies meetings (SB64), the transition away from fossil fuels will be a key test of whether growing political momentum can translate into practical progress.