Federal/provincial actions move Canada closer to 2020 target for GHG emissions reductions
WINNIPEG—November 6, 2011—The International Institute for Sustainable Development estimates new federal regulations combined with provincial actions will achieve nearly half the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions Canada has targeted under the Copenhagen Accord.
"Many Canadian GHG emitters are facing carbon costs consistent with emitters in the European Union and at levels well above competitors in the United States," said David Sawyer, IISD climate change and energy director and author of Mind the Gap: The State-of-Play in Canadian Greenhouse Gas Mitigation.
The Canadian Government is implementing policies that reduce GHG emissions by regulating new and modified coal-fired power facilities and through vehicle efficiency standards in order to meet its target of a 17 per cent reduction in emissions from 2005 by 2020.
The Canadian government isn't acting alone to reduce GHG emissions. "The emerging federal GHG emission mitigation policy builds on what is happening at a provincial level," Sawyer said.
"The federal and provincial governments are delivering reductions that jointly put Canada on track to achieve nearly half of its 2020 emissions reduction target," he said, adding that existing policies are already delivering 30 per cent of the target and the new measures should deliver a total of 46 per cent.
"Closing the remaining 54 per cent gap in Canada's target will be challenging and require a rethink on how we approach policy design, which has until recently focused on carbon pricing policies rather than performance-based regulations preferred by the Canadian government."
IISD's Mind the Gap paper provides new modelling to measure the impact of Canadian efforts to reduce GHG emissions, outlines five principles to guide policy development in a regulatory environment and offers three options Canada can consider to help it reach its target.
The first option suggests Canada can regulate all existing sources of carbon emissions, rather than just new or modified sources. It can also look at establishing a domestic offsets system and expand Canadian use of international offsets that take advantage of the relatively low-cost reductions available internationally.
"While it isn't currently politically feasible to implement a national carbon pricing policy, it will eventually be necessary in order to the deliver cost-effective reductions required to meet Canada's longer-term aspirations for GHG emission reductions," Sawyer said.
The report, Mind the Gap: The State-of-Play in Canadian Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, is one in a series of papers on the subject of Regulating Carbon Emissions in Canada. Please also see the commentary:State-of-Play in Canadian Federal and Provincial Greenhouse Gas Mitigation.
-end-
For more information please contact David Sawyer by email [email protected] or Nona Pelletier, IISD manager, public affairs at +1 (204) 958-7740, mobile: +1 (204) 962-1303, or email [email protected]
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is a globally recognized think tank with 3 decades of experience working to solve the world’s most pressing sustainable development challenges. We combine deep expertise in a wide range of issues with a collaborative approach to research, policy advice, and hands-on support to ensure these solutions are brought to life. Headquartered in Winnipeg, Manitoba, we are a diverse team of over 300 professionals working from offices in Canada, Switzerland, and other locations around the world.
You might also be interested in
Why the Scope of Taxes Covered Will Determine the Success of the UN Framework Convention’s Services Protocol
This article analyzes the UNFCITC draft protocol on cross-border services and its ambitious proposal to cover digital service taxes and quasi-income levies.
Strait of Hormuz Closure: Implications for African trade resilience
David Beer explores how the crisis in the Middle East is impacting African supply chains, while considering how the continent could turn this disruption into lasting gains for regional trade.
How the Hormuz Blockade Hit Asia
William George and Lynn Hughes assess how China, Japan, and Vietnam are navigating the fallout of the Strait of Hormuz closure and what it reveals about the state of energy security across Asia.
What the Hormuz Crisis Teaches Us About Agriculture’s Strategic Vulnerability
Darcie Doan explains how the Strait of Hormuz closure has exposed vulnerabilities at the heart of global food systems and why the crisis may be a turning point for smarter nitrogen use and long-term resilience.