Durban COP 17 side event puts spotlight on fossil fuel subsidy reform
Side event: Wednesday, December 7, 2011, 6:30 to 8:00 P.M. (SAST), Blyde River Room, Durban Exhibition Centre.
DURBAN—December 6, 2011—The substantial environmental and economic benefits of reforming fossil fuel subsidies are being debated on the sidelines of the 17th Conference of the Parties (COP 17) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Durban.
In September 2009, the leaders of the Group of 20 countries agreed to phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies over the medium term. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) governments made an almost identical pledge the same year.
At an event on December 7, 2011, ministers from New Zealand, Costa Rica, Sweden, Switzerland and Finland, along with the International Institute for Sustainable Development's Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI), will encourage G20 and APEC leaders to implement their political commitments to phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies as soon as possible, with maximum ambition and transparency.
The International Energy Agency estimates that fossil fuel-consumption subsidies totalled US$409 billion in 2010, an increase of almost US$110 billion from US$300 billion in 2009, placing a significant strain on government budgets in the face of rising international fuel prices.
Below-market fuel prices also bring down the cost of production and consumption, making it harder for cleaner forms of energy to compete, and leading to increased carbon dioxide emissions. A complete phase out of these would reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 5.8 per cent by 2020 as compared with business as usual.
At the same time, the Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform, a group of non-G20 countries that support the reform of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, fully recognize that domestic reform must take into account vulnerable communities' access to essential energy services. Established in June 2010, current members of the group include Costa Rica, Denmark, Ethiopia, Finland, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland.
GSI is a program of the International Institute for Sustainable Development that is dedicated to researching the scale of government subsidies and their impacts on sustainable development. -end-
For more information, please contact: Peter Wooders, IISD senior economist +41 76 430 50 26 or [email protected]; or Damon Vis-Dunbar, IISD communications coordinator, at +41 78 818-0501 or [email protected].
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come together. IISD’s staff of more than 250 experts come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries.
You might also be interested in
Countries' fossil fuel plans risk derailing efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C, report warns
A new report highlights how governments' fossil fuel production plans contradict climate commitments.
Climate goals and fossil fuel plans don't add up, experts say
Countries are still planning to increase production of fossil fuels to levels incompatible with global commitments on climate change, according to new research published on Monday.
Nations' plans to ramp up coal, gas and oil extraction 'will put climate goals beyond reach'
New data shows governments are now planning more fossil fuel production in coming decades than they were in 2023.
Governments’ Fossil Fuel Production Plans Continue to Steer World Further From Paris Agreement Warming Limits
A major new report published today finds that 10 years after the Paris Agreement, governments plan to produce about more than double (120%) the volume of fossil fuels in 2030 than would be consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5°C, and 77% more than would be consistent with 2°C.