Canada's proposed electricity regulations will reduce GHG emissions: social benefits to offset costs
WINNIPEG—April 16, 2012—Proposed federal regulations for Canada's electricity coal performance standards will see greenhouse gas emissions from the electricity sector fall, according to forecasts issued by the International Institute for Sustainable Development in a policy brief.
The Canadian government has moved to implement policies that reduce GHG emissions by regulating the performance of modified and new coal-fired power facilities that start generating electricity after July 1, 2015. Coal will likely be primarily displaced by natural gas turbines.
IISD uses original modelling to forecast that GHG emissions in the electricity sector will fall 25 per cent to 87 million tonnes in 2030 from 117 Mt in 2005.
The average cost of the proposed regulation could be about $26 per tonne of GHGs reduced from 2015 to 2030 or roughly $260 million per year. Emissions are likely to be reduced 5 Mt in 2020 and 20 Mt by 2030.
"These societal costs must be weighed against a number of benefits, including the reduction of GHG emissions and improvements in local air quality due to less air pollutants," said IISD climate change and energy director David Sawyer in the paper, Regulating Carbon in Canada: The impact of the federal government's proposed electricity coal performance standards. The actual value of these benefits weren't estimated in the report.
Together with recent federal vehicle efficiency standards and provincial government actions to reduce GHGs, Canada is now on track to achieve nearly a third of its emission reduction target under the Copenhagen Accord.
The regulations will apply to about 8 per cent of Canada's total forecast electricity generation in 2020 and about 54 per cent of fossil fuel generation.
Sawyer said Canadian GHG emitters are facing carbon costs consistent with emitters in the European Union and well above United States competitors' levels.
For additional details on regulating carbon emissions in Canada, please see the commentary Mind the Gap: The state-of-play in Canadian greenhouse gas mitigation.
-end-
For more information, please contact David Sawyer at dsawyer@iisd.ca or Nona Pelletier, IISD manager, public affairs at +1 (204) 958-7740, mobile: +1 (204) 962-1303 or email npelletier@iisd.ca.
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come together. IISD’s staff of more than 250 experts come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries.
You might also be interested in
What the G7 Ministerial Could Have Delivered on Fossil Fuel Subsidies Reform
The G7 climate, energy, and environment ministers’ meeting in Turin fell short when it came to breaking the 15 years of gridlock on fossil fuel subsidies. Here are three ways the G7 can use their next meetings to demonstrate measurable progress.
Adaptation is the world's unheralded tool to deal with climate change
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is a cut-and-dry way to stop climate change. But how the world responds to the impacts already taking place is a whole other can of worms—a large can, and one that can seem incomprehensible.
Could CSDDD Signal A Tipping Point For Corporate Accountability?
This week has seen the EU agree new rules on supply chain due diligence, one of a set of laws passed including action on toxic air, packaging and packaging waste. What the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive establishes is legal liability for corporates on environmental and human rights issues in the European courts—and that could change the framework of corporate accountability.
Why does the EU want to quit the Energy Charter Treaty?
European lawmakers have backed plans for the EU to exit a treaty that lets fossil fuel firms sue when climate policies hit profits.