Why we need environmental accounting
This article originally appeared in the August 2010 issue of The Bottom Line.
The need for consistent, decisive environmental accounting principles has been argued in professional circles for some time, but is perhaps never better illustrated than right now in aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon ecological catastrophe. This sad incident also reinforces the need to better account for the limits of nature's carrying capacity. The underlying issue is the why and how of putting a value on nature that will enable nature to effectively compete with the financial metrics of Return on Investment (ROI) in the global capital markets.Dan Rubenstein proposes a way of using new estimates of the dollar value of nature's services and incorporating these values in the traditional accounting model. Rubenstein's approach is unique in that it bridges the divide between ecological economics and traditional accounting for both business and government.
You might also be interested in
Canadians increasingly feeling effects of water-related challenges and want governments to act: New poll
Almost three in four Canadians say improving water infrastructure is urgent, with growing support for natural infrastructure solutions.
Why the Scope of Taxes Covered Will Determine the Success of the UN Framework Convention’s Services Protocol
This article analyzes the UNFCITC draft protocol on cross-border services and its ambitious proposal to cover digital service taxes and quasi-income levies.
Strait of Hormuz Closure: Implications for African trade resilience
David Beer explores how the crisis in the Middle East is impacting African supply chains, while considering how the continent could turn this disruption into lasting gains for regional trade.
How the Hormuz Blockade Hit Asia
William George and Lynn Hughes assess how China, Japan, and Vietnam are navigating the fallout of the Strait of Hormuz closure and what it reveals about the state of energy security across Asia.