Why we need environmental accounting
This article originally appeared in the August 2010 issue of The Bottom Line.
The need for consistent, decisive environmental accounting principles has been argued in professional circles for some time, but is perhaps never better illustrated than right now in aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon ecological catastrophe. This sad incident also reinforces the need to better account for the limits of nature's carrying capacity. The underlying issue is the why and how of putting a value on nature that will enable nature to effectively compete with the financial metrics of Return on Investment (ROI) in the global capital markets.Dan Rubenstein proposes a way of using new estimates of the dollar value of nature's services and incorporating these values in the traditional accounting model. Rubenstein's approach is unique in that it bridges the divide between ecological economics and traditional accounting for both business and government.
You might also be interested in
Bonn Climate Talks: What to watch for the fossil fuel transition
As governments return to Bonn for the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies meetings (SB64), the transition away from fossil fuels will be a key test of whether growing political momentum can translate into practical progress.
Energy Subsidy Reform Urgent as Spending Jumps 266.5%, Experts Say
Reforming Indonesia’s energy subsidies would strengthen fiscal credibility, ease pressure on the state budget, and support President Prabowo Subianto’s energy transition agenda, according to policy experts.
Vietnam, Indonesia launch new regulations for forest carbon projects
Vietnam’s rules say that revenue from forest-based carbon credits will be prioritised for forest protection and development, as well as community livelihoods. Indonesia has introduced a nesting framework to avoid double counting.
The world is moving off fossil fuels as Canada continues to live in the past
Like generals fighting the last war, our national debate is still dominated by fossil fuel exports. We’re still building LNG terminals and oil pipelines. While Canada’s auto strategy offered some support for EV buyers, Ottawa is still providing a half-billion-dollar taxpayer subsidy to a single diesel-engine pickup manufacturer.