Countries Continue to Pursue Efforts to Increase Transparency in Investor-state Dispute Settlement
In New York last week, a large number of countries, both developed and developing, strongly supported concrete options to ensure transparency in investor-state arbitrations.
However, some delegations continue to actively block progress on these important efforts to improve UN arbitration rules.
A set of procedural rules commonly used to govern investor-state arbitrations was created by a United Nations body, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), in 1976. In 2008, in response to mounting concerns regarding how these arbitration rules developed by UNCITRAL keep investor-state arbitrations removed from public view, UNCITRAL took action to remedy the situation.
In particular, UNCITRAL formally agreed on the importance of ensuring transparency in investor-state dispute arbitrations and mandated a working group to draft a legal standard that would open those cases up to the public. The working group initiated its work on this issue in 2010, and had its fourth session on the topic during the week of February 6-10, 2012. During that meeting, draft arbitration rules on transparency were strongly supported by a large number of developed and developing countries. However, progress stalled after some countries who attended the working group's session insisted that disputes arising under existing treaties be exempt from the new transparency rules.
You might also be interested in
Decoding the Belt and Road Initiative’s Legal Architecture
This article unpacks the Belt and Road Initiative's legal architecture—covering hard law (such as treaties and contracts), soft law (such as memoranda of understanding), and the unique role of China's state-owned enterprises—and sets out recommendations for host country policy-makers on how to navigate this hybrid legal environment.
What Happened in Santa Marta?
What happened at the first international conference on transitioning away from fossil fuels? IISD experts share 7 takeaways and discuss what comes next.
Tax Incentives in National Investment Laws
This report maps the design, legal structure, and governance arrangements of tax incentives across 105 national investment laws to support better coordination among the institutions that shape these policies and help countries attract quality investment.
Understanding Investor–State Dispute Settlement in the Mining Sector
This brief introduces investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) for mining policy-makers and shows how understanding it helps governments design clearer rules, manage permits and contracts, prevent costly disputes, and protect policy spaces while maintaining a predictable investment climate.