How NGOs Can Survive in the Age of Distrust
For the fourth year in a row, Transparify—an initiative that assigns global ratings of financial transparency to think tanks and policy-driven non-profits—has given the International Institute for Sustainable Development the highest possible marks for financial disclosure.
That’s a tremendous shout-out to IISD’s character as we prepare to celebrate significant birthdays. This year, IISD Experimental Lakes Area turns 50, while our larger organization crosses the 30-year mark in 2020. It’s thanks to our culture of accountability and openness we’re making it past those milestones, I think. IISD has always invested in a financial team that delivers exceptional levels of professionalism and dedication.
Our decision to list all of our diverse donors, identify funding amounts and to detail the specific projects they support matters to modern donors. Gone are the days of giving to "charity"; donors today make "investments" that achieve verifiable progress.
I wholly endorse this mindset—one driven by an increased urgency to achieve sustainable development goals like increasing access to clean power or ending hunger. The needs of our planet have never been greater. It only makes sense to ensure the right dollars are going to the right causes from the right sources, with a diverse funding base that supports objectivity.
This shift also speaks to our more skeptical society. Last year the Edelman Trust Barometer, which surveys tens of thousands of people around the world, found we trust government, media, businesses and NGOs less. We’re less likely to take promises to “do the right thing” at face value.
In an age where authenticity and honesty are worth their weight in gold, IISD and other NGOs will continue to flourish in part by demanding rigorous standards. The Transparify report keeps us on that path—one we are committed to traveling for the next 50 years.
You might also be interested in
Fossil fuel extraction must be stopped to limit global warming
New research published in the journal Environmental Research Letters emphasizes the urgency of climate change. The study shows that stopping new oil, gas and coal development isn’t enough. To avoid going over the 1.5°C temperature change limit, not only do new fossil fuel extraction projects need to be stopped, but some existing and approved projects must also be decommissioned.
Mining and drilling outside Russia is 'not a viable response' to Ukraine war, climate scientists say
It is now clear that keeping fossil fuels in the ground is the single biggest factor in whether we keep global temperatures below pre-industrial levels- or below 1.5C as it is often referred to. But a new study shows that this means more than just not mining or drilling at new sites.
Study: Existing oil, gas, and coal extraction sites need to be closed down to stay within 1.5°C, findings show
Ceasing new oil, gas, and coal development is not enough—already built extraction facilities must be prematurely decommissioned—warns a new study released today in Environmental Research Letters.
Study warns developed fossil fuel reserves will need to shut to meet 1.5C limit
Stopping new oil, gas and coal developments is not enough to limit dangerous global warming – existing sites will also need to be shut down, a study warns.