What Is the Energy Charter Treaty and What Does it Mean for Sustainable Development?
What Is the Energy Charter Treaty?
The Energy Charter Treaty, commonly referred to as the ECT, is an investment treaty that was developed in the 1990s to enable multilateral cooperation in the energy sector in the wake of the Cold War. Its 53 contracting parties include countries in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, as well as the European Union and Euratom.
However, the treaty is being used more and more frequently by fossil fuel investors to mitigate the losses they incur from public policies. Using a mechanism known as investor–state dispute settlement, or ISDS, the fossil fuel industry has sued governments and obtained record-breaking damages awards that cost taxpayers millions of dollars.
IISD research shows that the fossil fuel industry uses ISDS more than any other sector. The average amount awarded—over USD 600 million—is almost five times the amount awarded in non-fossil fuel cases. The ECT is facilitating such claims more than any other investment treaty.
What Is at Stake?
Arbitration claims challenging government actions made in the public interest, such as environmental policies or the protection of human rights and local communities, are on the rise. In particular, privileges granted to foreign investments are increasingly in conflict with efforts to curb climate change and protect the natural world.
Widespread recognition that the ECT is an obstacle to the transition to a low-carbon economy has led its contracting parties to start negotiations on how to effectively “modernize” the treaty to better align it with their investment and climate goals.
What Is IISD Doing to Help?
At IISD, we work with governments, civil society, academia, legal experts, and others to influence the modernization process and develop legal and policy options that will support an expedited phase-out of fossil fuels. This work forms part of our wider mission to ensure that investment law and policy help to facilitate rather than impede progress toward achieving global sustainable development goals.
Together, we seek to break down the legal barriers that prevent countries from pursuing ambitious actions to protect our planet.
You might also be interested in
Legal expert: ECT withdrawal 'is the only possible course of action'
Following the decision by several EU member states to leave the controversial Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), the European Commission must now put proposals on the table for the EU to withdraw collectively, says Lukas Schaugg.
In U-turn, Brussels recommends EU-wide exit from controversial Energy Charter Treaty
In a notable U-turn, the European Commission has proposed a collective and coordinated exit of all 27 member states from the controversial Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), an obscure international agreement that protects energy investors from unexpected circumstances that might hurt their profit expectations.
Energy Charter Treaty Withdrawal Announcements Reflect Reform Outcome is Insufficient for Climate Ambition
The wave of announcements from several EU member states of their plans to withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty reinforce that efforts to reform the controversial accord have been insufficient to support ambitious climate action.
Posts misinterpret European nations' withdrawal from fossil fuel treaty: experts
Legal experts say a claim shared across social media misleadingly suggests that several European nations, including France and the Netherlands, have withdrawn from a decades-old Energy Charter Treaty (ETC) because they are "jumping ship on climate commitments". In fact, the experts say, France and the Netherlands announced that a proposed amendment to the treaty does not accord with the Paris Agreement, making it "incompatible with (their) climate goals".