



|
Over the past 20 years, an extraordinary number of international environmental agreements have been concluded. More than 200 multilateral environmental agreementsdefined in this book as those involving more than two countriesare known to exist. Some of these are global treaties, open to any country. The number of bilateral agreements is unknown, but is thought to be well in excess of a thousand. The result is an international structure for environmental management that was not premeditated, and that reflects the extraordinary diversity of issues and interests involved.
Very few MEAs actually regulate trade or contain trade provisions. Of the 20 or so that do, even fewer are of notable significance to the environment-trade interface. Seven of the most important are discussed in greater detail below.
|
Box 2-2: Key MEAs with trade provisions
- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)1975
- Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Stratospheric Ozone Layer1987
- Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal1992
- Convention on Biological Diversity1993
- Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC)1994
- Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (PIC)1998
- Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety2000
(Dates indicate entry into force, except for the PIC Convention and the Cartagena Protocol, which have not yet entered into force. Here, the dates refer to the completion of negotiations.)
|
Increasingly, the complex of institutions and organizations that develop around international environmental agreements are referred to as "regimes," expressing the reality that they involve a number of constituencies and actors, and no longer reflect the dynamics of power between sovereign states alone. The rules governing these regimes differ from one to another reflecting the provisions of the relevant agreement. But all draw on customary international law and a range of practices and principles that have become widely accepted.
The international structure of environmental management is extremely dynamic. The various regimes address a wide variety of issues, ranging from toxic substances to the protection of elephants, from air pollution to biodiversity. As well, they must respond to changing scientific information about the environment, changing perceptions of the significance of this information, and the constant feedback from the successes and failures of the measures adopted in support of their objectives.
|
|