Thehas deemed that the included in the Canada– is consistent with EU law, issuing its final opinion on April 30, 2019.
Twenty-twomember states endorsed a political declaration on January 15, 2019, where they announced a series of actions involving existing intra-EU BITs and upcoming or ongoing investment arbitration.
MASDAR SOLAR & WIND COOPERATIEF U.A. V. THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN,CASE NO. ARB/14/1
Luxembourg fund awarded EUR 53.3 million for FET breach arising out of Spain’s curtailment of renewable energy incentive schemes
NOVENERGIA II – ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT (SCA) (GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG), SICAR V. THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN,CASE NO. 063/2015
Current and future investment treaties and chapters involvingmember states or the Union itself may be profoundly impacted by a landmark ruling of the European Court of Justice ( ). In this piece, the author explores the judgement from an EU constitutional point of view and analyzes potential consequences. Did the Achmea ruling come as a surprise to EU law insiders?
On September 6, 2017, Belgium submitted to the Court of Justice of the European Union () a request for an opinion on the compatibility of the with the European Treaties.
Can the European Union act alone in concluding agreements such asand the –Singapore ? Or must EU member states also ratify them? Advocate General Sharpston discusses the allocation of powers in the field of investment under EU law.
Legality of investor–state dispute settlement (including in the form of an Investment Court System) intrade agreements under EU law is a contentious issue. This article details four legal objections raised by academics and legal experts, and discusses the potential for a legal challenge of under EU law.
ICSID tribunal dismisses final claim for compensation in relation to Hungary’s 2008 termination of power purchase agreement
Electrabel S.A. v. Republic of Hungary,Case No. ARB/07/1
The book examines the links between investment law and other sub-fields of international law, including the law on armed conflict, human rights, sustainable development, trade, development andlaw.
Advocate General renders opinion on Finland’s investment treaties with non-EU countries; Sweden begins compliance with earlier ECJ decision
October 2, 2009 Correction: The original version of this article indicated that thehad rendered a decision in the case Finland. In fact, an Advocate General has issued an opinion, which is not binding on the Court. The article has been revised accordingly. An Advocate General of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) […]
European Court of Justice rules that certain Swedish and Austrian BITs are incompatible with the EC Treaty
The European Court of Justice () has ruled that certain clauses in Sweden and Austria’s bilateral investment treaties are incompatible with the European Community ( ) Treaty.