Amicus Curiae Fundación Pachamama and The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)—Chevron v. Ecuador
This amicus curiae brief focuses on the investor-State arbitration under the UNCITRAL arbitration rules with Chevron Corporation as the Claimant, and the Republic of Ecuador as the Respondent.
This amicus curiae brief focuses on the investor-State arbitration under the UNCITRAL arbitration rules with Chevron Corporation as the Claimant, and the Republic of Ecuador as the Respondent.
The brief examines the extraordinary nature of this arbitration and analyzes the orders sought by the Claimant, Chevron, and their implications. It includes a summary of the arguments presented by amicus and describes the background to this arbitration. The brief comes to the conclusion that the Tribunal should dismiss the present arbitration on the basis of a lack of jurisdiction (the tribunal has no jurisdiction under the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty), and of a lack of justiciability of the orders sought by the Claimant.
You might also be interested in
Chevron v Ecuador: Petition for Participation as Non-disputing Parties
Carbon Offset Deals and the Risks of “Green Grabbing”
Governments must ensure land-based investments for carbon removal respect the access and tenure rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities.
Rethinking Investment Treaties
The reports maps out how the treaty system can be redesigned from the bottom up to accelerate—rather than obstruct—genuine sustainable development and international cooperation.
CSDDD: EU's Due diligence law vote should drive supply chain sustainability efforts
The European Parliament has voted to adopt the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, aiming to address the environmental and social impacts of the supply chains of Europe's large corporations.