Submission to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development on Investment Agreements and Climate Change
Investment law and policy can play a significant role in either addressing—or exacerbating—some of the world’s greatest challenges, from climate change to inequality. In light of this, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has developed a work programme on “The Future of Investment Treaties,” which recognizes the need to reshape investment treaties so they facilitate rather than impede progress toward tackling these challenges.
As part of this work, OECD launched a public consultation in early 2022 to gather views from a wide range of stakeholders on how policy-makers can redesign investment treaties and policies in response to the escalating climate crisis. Government representatives will discuss the submissions received at the 7th annual OECD Investment Treaty Conference on May 10, 2022.
IISD worked in partnership with ClientEarth and the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) to respond to the consultation. Our submission outlines some of the major conflicts that exist between investment law and environmental regulations, including how priority given to investment protection in arbitral tribunals can discourage countries from pursuing ambitious environmental measures. It also details the main barriers to change in the investment treaty regime, such as a lack of coherence and consensus on how reform efforts should proceed. Finally, it proposes a series of policy recommendations aimed at coordinating reform efforts and reconciling climate and investment objectives.
You might also be interested in
Lukas Schaugg: "The Energy Charter Treaty hinders climate action"
The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), established decades ago to facilitate energy investments in Europe and Central Asia, is now being challenged and accused of protecting investments in fossil fuels. Faced with the failure of the reform processes undertaken so far, several European countries, notably France and Germany, have decided to exit the ECT. However, the treaty is trying to expand to Africa as new oil and gas fields are discovered on the continent. In this interview, Lukas Schaugg, International Law Analyst at the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), describes the challenges of the ECT in the face of the climate emergency.
Lukas Schaugg : « Le Traité sur la charte de l’énergie entrave l’action climatique » (in French)
Mis en place il y a plusieurs décennies pour faciliter les investissements dans l’énergie en Europe et en Asie centrale, le Traité sur la charte de l’énergie (TCE) est aujourd’hui contesté et accusé de protéger les investissements dans les énergies fossiles. Face à l’échec des processus de réforme engagés à ce jour, plusieurs pays européens, notamment la France et l’Allemagne, ont décidé de sortir du TCE. Cependant, le traité tente de s’étendre vers l’Afrique au moment où de nouveaux gisements de gaz et de pétrole sont découverts sur le continent. Dans cet entretien, Lukas Schaugg, Analyste en droit international à l’Institut international du développement durable (IISD), décrit les enjeux du TCE à l’heure de l’urgence climatique.
Länders avhopp från omstritt energiavtal sätter press på Sverige (in Swedish)
Danmark är det senaste EU-landet som drar sig ur Energistadgefördraget, ECT. Avtalet skyddar energiinvesteringar och används för att kräva skadestånd på många miljarder när länder fasar ut olja och kol.
EU-landenes opgør med sorte investorer kan give grønt bagslag (in Danish)
Danmark og andre EU-lande er ved at aflive en central international aftale om beskyttelse af energiinvestorer. Et uheldigt signal, når EU-landene skal finde milliarder af private investeringer til den grønne omstilling, vurderer chefanalytiker. Et nødvendigt skridt i opgøret med fossile investeringer, siger ekspert i bæredygtighed og international ret.