Redesigning the Energy Charter Treaty to Advance the Low-Carbon Transition
The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), if revised, could have a particularly important role to play, given the importance of the energy sector in relation to both contributing to global warming and providing climate change solutions.
Unlike most other investment treaties and chapters in trade agreements covering all sectors and measures indiscriminately, the ECT covers only activities in the energy sector. It covers a large range of activities relating to oil, gas, and coal, as well as wind and solar power and other renewable energy sources.
At a time when climate change is a top priority and the most pressing environmental and developmental issue for the future of our planet, a revised ECT should, from a normative perspective, play an important role in the transition from fossil fuel-based energy to renewable, clean energy.
In order to ensure mutual supportiveness between environmental and economic goals set at the international level, the ECT should be redesigned to bring it in line with—and help achieve—states’ international commitment under the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
This paper discusses the ECT and the Paris Agreement regimes and their inter-relationship, highlighting how they pull in different directions. It presents three building blocks that could be adopted in a revised ECT to align it with the Paris Agreement: encouraging low-carbon energy investments; discouraging carbon-intensive energy investments; and ensuring a just transition to low-carbon economies and societies. Finally, it proposes ways to reform the ECT through a climate lens as well as through a broader socioeconomic sustainability lens.
This paper was originally published in the Transnational Dispute Management (TDM) 1 (2019) "Modernisation of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT)" Special Issue as N. Bernasconi-Osterwalder & M.D. Brauch; "Redesigning the Energy Charter Treaty to Advance the Low-Carbon Transition," TDM 1 (2019), available at https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2632
Republished with permission from TDM.
You might also be interested in
Can a $20 billion bet wean Indonesia off coal?
Less than a year after it was announced, a $20-billion bet to wean Indonesia off coal is mired in controversies over financing and the construction of new plants to power industry. The Just Energy Transition Partnership for Indonesia was unveiled last November and follows a model first trialed in South Africa, with rich countries pledging funds for the developing world's energy transition.
Building a Net-Zero World: How U.S. Finance Can Strengthen Clean Energy Manufacturing Abroad
The world needs to rapidly expand and diversify clean energy supply chains to achieve net-zero carbon dioxide emissions by 2050 and mitigate dangerous climate impacts. While some sectors, such as solar photovoltaic manufacturing, are on track to hit their 2030 targets, there are major shortfalls in the production of many other clean energy products.
War in Ukraine Makes Just Transition on Energy More Urgent
Even in the midst of war, there is a struggle for Ukraine's energy future. It's one that international allies of Ukraine's social movements need to pay attention to, because states like the United States and United Kingdom, and international organizations like the European Union, will be influential in how that tussle turns out.
Canada, a giant oil producer, urges others to end fossil fuel subsidies
Canada is pushing the United States and other major economies to follow through on pledges to phase out "inefficient" fossil fuel subsidies, which have soared despite the growing threat of climate change. Such subsidies hit records last year, according to several watchdog groups, including one that estimated that major world economies—members of the G-20 cooperation forum—surpassed $1 trillion in subsidies for the first time in 2022. That’s a fourfold increase over subsidy levels in 2010, the year after G-20 nations agreed to phase out support for fossil fuels.