Phasing Out Fossil Fuel Subsidies Would Result in Large Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2020—New Research
BONN—October 22, 2015—Removing fossil fuel subsidies would significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions within 5 years. Governments can further reduce emissions by simultaneously investing some of those savings into renewable energy and energy efficiency.
This is according to new research by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the Nordic Council of Ministers (NCM) in a report, “Tackling Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Climate Change: Levelling the energy playing field.”
IISD and NCM modeled the impact of removing fossil fuel subsidies in 20 countries between now and 2020. They found that this alone would reduce national emissions, against business as usual, by an average of 11 per cent. By taking 30 per cent of subsidy savings, and investing in renewable energy and energy efficiency, national emissions are reduced further to an average of 18 per cent by 2020. In total, from across just 20 countries by 2020, it is estimated that 2.8 Gt of CO2 would be removed from the atmosphere.
“The numbers point to an important opportunity for both national carbon emissions reductions, and for financing the transformation of our energy systems,” said Scott Vaughan, president-CEO of IISD.
The estimated emission reductions vary significantly by country. Those countries with large fossil fuel subsidies, and which have the greatest potential for switching to cleaner and more efficient energy, would see the largest reductions.
Nordic countries have been important supporters of fossil fuel subsidy reform. Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland are members of the Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform, a grouping that also includes New Zealand, Costa Rica, Switzerland and Ethiopia. In the lead up to the Paris Climate Change Conference, the Friends are backing a Communiqué that calls on the international community to increase efforts to phase-out subsidies to fossil fuels.
"With average yearly financial savings to governments of around US$ 93 per tonne of carbon removed from the system, fossil fuel subsidy reform is one policy tool that governments can no longer afford to ignore," said Anna Lindstedt, Climate Ambassador for Sweden.
“Tackling Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Climate Change: Levelling the energy playing field” is available here.
- IISD and NCM developed and applied an economic simulation model that tracks energy demand at the national level by sector and source. The model uses social and economic drivers to determine future energy consumption and related greenhouse gas emissions.
- The countries modeled are: Saudi Arabia, Iran, India, China, Indonesia, Russia, Venezuela, Iraq, Egypt, Algeria, United Arab Emirates, Bangladesh, United States of America, Pakistan, Nigeria, Viet Nam, Tunisia, Morocco, Ghana, and Sri Lanka. These are subset of countries that subsidise fossil fuels.
- The Nordic Council of Ministers is the official inter-governmental body for co-operation in the Nordic Region.
- The Global Subsidies Initiative was established by IISD in 1995 to quantify and analyse subsidies, and support countries in the reform of subsidies that are detrimental to sustainable development.
- The International Energy Agency estimates that subsidies for the consumption of fossil fuels amounted to US$ 550 billion in 2013.
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come together. IISD’s staff of more than 200 experts come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries.
You might also be interested in
Reporting on Progress in National Adaptation Plan Processes
Progress reporting is a critical element of the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process that helps facilitate its regular tracking and continuous enhancement of adaptation planning and implementation.
Can a $20 billion bet wean Indonesia off coal?
Less than a year after it was announced, a $20-billion bet to wean Indonesia off coal is mired in controversies over financing and the construction of new plants to power industry. The Just Energy Transition Partnership for Indonesia was unveiled last November and follows a model first trialed in South Africa, with rich countries pledging funds for the developing world's energy transition.
Transboundary Climate Risks and the National Adaptation Planning Process
Climate risks cut across national borders. This brief aims to offer adaptation practitioners, policy-makers, and negotiators—especially those involved in their countries' national adaptation plan (NAP) processes—new perspectives on how the NAP process can play a role in addressing transboundary climate risks.
Lithium-Sourcing Roadmap for India
This report aims to provide a strategy to guide policy-makers in sourcing lithium responsibly to promote clean energy manufacturing in India, with the broader aim of supporting low-carbon economic growth, creating equitable jobs, and helping to mitigate climate change impacts.