IISD Welcomes ICJ Judges’ Decision to no Longer Participate in Investor–State Arbitration
GENEVA, October 27—Members of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) have decided they “will not normally accept to participate in international arbitration” and, “in particular, they will not participate in investor–State arbitration or in commercial arbitration.” International law experts at the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) welcome the news.
In a speech to the United Nations General Assembly on October 25, Judge Abdulqawi Yusuf, President of the ICJ, described how Members of the Court have “sometimes been called upon by States to sit on … arbitral tribunals … dealing in some cases with inter-State disputes while in others with investor–State disputes.” He went on to mention that, in light of its ever-increasing workload, the Court has recently decided to review this practice and to set out clearly defined rules regulating such activities.
Is “Moonlighting” a Problem? The role of ICJ judges in ISDS, released by IISD last year, found that sitting judges of the International Court of Justice have worked as arbitrators in at least 90 investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) cases.
“IISD has raised a number of issues in relation to ICJ judges acting as arbitrators in investor–state disputes. Our November 2017 paper created a public discussion about the issue,” said Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Director of IISD’s Economic Law & Policy program. She co-authored the study with Martin Dietrich Brauch, an Associate and International Law Adviser with IISD.
Bernasconi stated: “IISD welcomes the news that ICJ judges will, from now on, no longer participate in investor–state arbitration or in commercial arbitration. This move will go a long way in ensuring the ICJ’s reputation for independence as the highest authority on public international law remains intact.”
The ICJ is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It has a twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to it by states (its judgments have binding force and are without appeal for the parties concerned); and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized UN organs and agencies of the system. The Court is composed of 15 judges elected for a nine-year term by the UN General Assembly and the UN Security Council.
In the future, the Court will, under exceptional circumstances, authorize its members to participate in state–state arbitrations, “if the circumstances so warrant.” President Yusuf clarified that even in such exceptional cases, a Member of the Court will only participate, if authorized, in one arbitration procedure at a time, and provided that the appointment as an arbitrator is not by a State that is a party in a case pending before the Court. This contrasts with current practice pursuant to which some judges increasingly served as arbitrators in several investor–state arbitrations at the same time, alongside their function as members of the International Court of Justice.
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come together. IISD’s staff of more than 120 people, plus over 150 associates and consultants, come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries.
You might also be interested in
Lukas Schaugg: "The Energy Charter Treaty hinders climate action"
The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), established decades ago to facilitate energy investments in Europe and Central Asia, is now being challenged and accused of protecting investments in fossil fuels. Faced with the failure of the reform processes undertaken so far, several European countries, notably France and Germany, have decided to exit the ECT. However, the treaty is trying to expand to Africa as new oil and gas fields are discovered on the continent. In this interview, Lukas Schaugg, International Law Analyst at the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), describes the challenges of the ECT in the face of the climate emergency.
Lukas Schaugg : « Le Traité sur la charte de l’énergie entrave l’action climatique » (in French)
Mis en place il y a plusieurs décennies pour faciliter les investissements dans l’énergie en Europe et en Asie centrale, le Traité sur la charte de l’énergie (TCE) est aujourd’hui contesté et accusé de protéger les investissements dans les énergies fossiles. Face à l’échec des processus de réforme engagés à ce jour, plusieurs pays européens, notamment la France et l’Allemagne, ont décidé de sortir du TCE. Cependant, le traité tente de s’étendre vers l’Afrique au moment où de nouveaux gisements de gaz et de pétrole sont découverts sur le continent. Dans cet entretien, Lukas Schaugg, Analyste en droit international à l’Institut international du développement durable (IISD), décrit les enjeux du TCE à l’heure de l’urgence climatique.
Länders avhopp från omstritt energiavtal sätter press på Sverige (in Swedish)
Danmark är det senaste EU-landet som drar sig ur Energistadgefördraget, ECT. Avtalet skyddar energiinvesteringar och används för att kräva skadestånd på många miljarder när länder fasar ut olja och kol.
A Guide for Developing Countries on How to Understand and Adapt to the Global Minimum Tax
This guide provides policy-makers in developing countries with a simple framework to understand the global minimum tax, how it may affect them, and how to adapt domestic tax policy in response.