Treaty on Sustainable Investment for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
The Treaty on Sustainable Investment for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation was one of the 2018 winners of the Stockholm Treaty Lab prize, awarded to two submissions that year for work that involved “unique approaches to the challenge.”
Prepared by an IISD-led team with backgrounds ranging from international investment law to economics and energy policy, the treaty sets out a legal framework aimed at fostering climate-friendly, resilient investments while disincentivizing unsustainable investments, along with enabling a just transition. The work was motivated by the UN’s Paris Agreement on climate change and informed by the lessons learned from extensive research, advisory work, and engagement on the current international investment regime and its impacts on climate action.
Known as the “Creative Disrupters,” this team was invited to present their work at numerous forums around the world after winning the prize.
The treaty text is available in full on the Stockholm Treaty Lab site, as are supporting documents explaining the model treaty’s relationship to the prize assessment criteria.
In the years since the treaty won the prize, it has drawn the attention of academics and policy professionals alike for its potential to incentive investment in low-carbon technologies and correct some of the current deficiencies in the international investment regime. Members of the Creative Disrupters have published on their work in the SDG Knowledge Hub and in a special edition of The Journal of International Arbitration, as part of their outreach and engagement with a wide range of stakeholders from policy and law.
The June 2020 edition of Investment Treaty News also featured in-depth legal analysis on how the treaty could be used to foster low-carbon investment and where it can be improved.
You might also be interested in
Governments' Climate Laws Could Spur $340B In ISDS Claims
As governments consider how and when to enact legislation or mitigation measures meant to address climate change, a study shows there is a pricey cause for concern as fossil fuel companies could bring legal claims worth billions of dollars against them in order to protect their assets.
The fossil fuel industry has a trillion-dollar secret weapon to kneecap climate action
On his first day in office, President Joe Biden revoked the permit for the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline, which would have brought exceptionally dirty oil south from Canada across the Plains. The project’s owner, Calgary-based TC Energy, saw billions in future profits go up in smoke. So it turned to an arcane but potentially explosive tool to try to recoup the loss, filing a claim under the now-defunct North American Free Trade Agreement. The company is seeking $15 billion.
Investor-state disputes threaten the global green energy transition
To limit global warming to below 1.5°C, governments will have to simultaneously curb demand for fossil fuels and limit supply. However, efforts to limit supply will affect asset holders, particularly in the upstream (exploration and production) and midstream (transportation and storage) portions of the supply chain. Demands for compensation will ensue, and when the companies involved are foreign, legal claims may be brought to international arbitration in a process known as investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) (see the first figure). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has recently acknowledged that ISDS cases could lead to states refraining from, or delaying, measures to phase out fossil fuels.
Energy experts fear India's turn to 'dirty coal' commercially unviable
Amidst the coal crisis where the Centre has invoked an emergency law to operate idle coal import-based utilities, energy transition experts believe the electricity generation for 1.35 billion people based on expensive imported coal for blending is commercially unviable -- both high and inflationary.