Transparency in the Dispute Settlement Process: Country best practices
In many investor-state arbitrations, it is difficult or impossible even to know that the dispute has been initiated, what the issues and arguments are, and what decisions or awards have been made to resolve the matter.
This lack of transparency is not something that the treaties require; rather, it is an outcome that arises because the treaties are often silent on issues of transparency and confidentiality in investor-state dispute settlement. Yet this is changing. Concern about the lack of public access to information regarding investor-state arbitrations has been mounting over roughly the past decade, tracking the rise of treaty-based investor-state arbitration itself. In response to those concerns, states have begun to take more direct control over the matter by inserting provisions on transparency directly in their treaties. This bulletin provides an overview of those practices, with a focus on individual agreements negotiated by Canada, the United States, Chile, Singapore, Australia and New Zealand, as well as regional arrangements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the investment agreement of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), among others. It also reviews a number of selected model agreements. The aim is to illustrate the various approaches countries have increasingly adopted to incorporate transparency into the various stages of the dispute settlement process.
You might also be interested in
IISD Best Practices Series: Registration and Approval Requirements in Investment Treaties
This paper analyzes registration and approval requirements for investments in investment treaties, and examines the interpretation of such provisions by arbitral tribunals.
Assessing the Impacts of Investment Treaties: Overview of the evidence
Investment treaties grant powerful legal rights to foreign investors. Foreign investors’ ability to frame plausible multimillion-dollar claims against a wide range of host government actions—and the fact that these claims are adjudicated through a system of private arbitration—has made investment treaties controversial. This scoping study seeks to provide an overview and assessment of existing evidence of investment treaties’ impacts.
Investment Treaty News Quarterly (ITN), Volume 8, Issue 3, September 2017
Investment Treaty News (ITN) is IISD’s flagship quarterly journal on international investment law and policy.
Investment Treaty News Quarterly (ITN), Volume 8, Issue 2, June 2017
Investment Treaty News is IISD’s flagship quarterly journal on international investment law and policy.