Environmental Goods and Services Negotiations at the WTO: Lessons from multilateral environmental agreements and ecolabels for breaking the impasse
This analysis looks for paths to progress in the WTO's stalled negotiations on environmental goods and services—a set of talks that is frequently cited as trade policy's natural contribution to climate change objectives.
It surveys the experience of a number of multilateral environmental agreements—The Rotterdam Convention (Prior Informed Consent or PIC), the Stockholm Convention (Persistent Organic Pollutants or POPs) and Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora—and ecolabels (looking at coffee, fisheries and the Energy Star label) for helpful lessons.
Focusing on environmental goods, the analysis begins by creating a taxonomy that allows different treatments for fundamentally different sorts of goods. Type I goods are those, like efficient washers, that are relatively green in their end use or disposal. Type III goods are those that are relatively environmentally friendly in their manner of production, like organic agricultural products. And Type II goods are those that are designed for environmental improvement or natural resource management, such as equipment to contain oil spills.
On the basis of the analysis, the paper makes six recommendations:
Start from first principles (enunciate an environmental objective);
Refer to standards created outside the WTO, where they exist (most relevant for Types I and II);
Where standards do not exist, go slowly (elaborate criteria for "acceptable" standards that may be created in the future and look to non-standards-based lists for Type II goods);
Build in flexibility (for example, so that countries can lodge limited reservations for specific goods);
Base it on science (establish and use technical bodies); and
Build in special and differential treatment.
You might also be interested in
The Sustainable Agriculture Transition: Technology options for low- and middle-income countries
This report reviews how technology is transforming food systems and how policy-makers and investors can best harness the use of modern technologies to bring transformative change.
COVID-19 and Food Export Restrictions: Comparing today’s situation to the 2007/08 price spikes
This policy brief draws on the International Food Policy Research Institute’s (IFPRI’s) COVID-19 Food Trade Policy Tracker to compare how governments have reacted to the current crisis with how they did during the 2007/08 food price spike.
Could Food Export Restrictions Worsen a Looming Food Crisis?
This policy brief draws on analysis in the International Food Policy Research Institute’s (IFPRI’s) COVID-19 Food Trade Policy Tracker to examine how food-importing countries could be affected by recent measures to restrict exports.
Stock Take of APEC Economies’ Existing Measures on Withdrawal of Subsidies in Cases Where There Has Been a Determination of IUU Fishing
This report provides an overview of APEC economies’ existing measures on withdrawal of subsidies in cases of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, drawing on the voluntary responses and input of member economies