Contracts for Sustainable Infrastructure: Ensuring the economic, social and environmental co-benefits of infrastructure investment projects
Infrastructure—including transportation, electricity, telecommunications, water and sanitation—is essential to the achievement of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and to the success of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.
However, to achieve the SDGs and address climate change, the infrastructure to be upgraded and built must be sustainable—it must be specifically designed to mitigate economic, social and environmental risks, and to generate economic, social and environmental co-benefits.
Public–private partnerships (PPPs) are among the modes that government may adopt to structure infrastructure projects. The PPP contract forms a significant part of the normative framework governing the relationship between the government and the investor, allocating responsibilities and risks. For PPPs to lead to the development of sustainable infrastructure, governments and private parties must ensure that sustainability criteria are embedded in the project from its inception and appropriately reflected in the PPP contract.
The 2017 edition of the World Bank Group’s Guidance on PPP Contractual Provisions presents sample contract language that governments may adopt for PPPs. However, as pointed out by Foley Hoag LLP, the guidance frequently offers advice that restrains government measures aimed at achieving the SDGs, and misses an opportunity to consider how infrastructure projects can contribute to sustainable development.
Complementing the analysis by Foley Hoag LLP, this report seizes the opportunity missed by the World Bank Group’s guidance. Bridging IISD’s experience in public procurement and infrastructure finance and investment, it defines sustainable infrastructure, outlines its expected characteristics and co-benefits, and presents why governments must and how they can integrate sustainability into infrastructure contracts.
You might also be interested in
Investment Dispute Prevention and Management Agencies
This report informs policy discussions about national agencies that prevent and manage investment disputes by analyzing their design, operation, and effects.
Rising Trend in Investment Arbitrations Threatens to Undermine Climate Measures
New research from IISD highlights what could be at stake for climate action as negotiators continue discussions on modernizing the Energy Charter Treaty.
Message to mayors: cities need nature
To thrive, cities must lean into nature. That means having open green spaces and interconnected waterways to prevent floods; green roofs and walls that reduce temperatures and produce food; and forests planted as green belts to oxygenate urban areas and regenerate ecosystems.
Private climate investment needs to get intentional about gender and equity — here’s how
The private capital committed by members of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) has the potential to transform climate investments. Yet climate investment decision-makers don’t reflect the diversity we need for a just transition. They are therefore likely to overlook the women outside of their networks driving many solutions.