{"id":9257,"date":"2023-07-01T08:38:08","date_gmt":"2023-07-01T06:38:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cf.iisd.net\/itn\/?p=9257"},"modified":"2024-08-09T18:33:00","modified_gmt":"2024-08-09T16:33:00","slug":"la-cij-dicta-sentencia-sobre-el-fondo-en-el-caso-certain-iranian-assets-republica-islamica-de-iran-vs-estados-unidos-de-america","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/2023\/07\/01\/la-cij-dicta-sentencia-sobre-el-fondo-en-el-caso-certain-iranian-assets-republica-islamica-de-iran-vs-estados-unidos-de-america\/","title":{"rendered":"ICJ delivers its merits judgment in Certain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On March 30, 2023, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued its judgment on the merits in a case closely watched by the investment law community. The case concerned the alleged violations of the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights between the two states by the United States regarding Iranian assets on U.S. territory. The majority of the court decided in favour of Iran, finding violations of a number of provisions of the treaty.<\/p>\n<p>The case is likely to have repercussions in <span class='tooltipsall tooltipsincontent classtoolTips43'>ISDS<\/span> practice, as the ICJ has pronounced itself on the interpretation and application of some of the most common investment protection standards, such as non-impairment, full protection and security, and indirect (judicial) expropriation.<\/p>\n<p>We analyze the decision in greater detail in one of this issue\u2019s Insights.<!--more--><\/p>\n<script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips43','investor\u2013state dispute settlement'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips58','soluci\u00f3n de controversias inversionista-Estado'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips67','Energy Charter Treaty'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips76','multilateral investment court'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips100','investissement direct \u00e9tranger'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips106','asociaci\u00f3n p\u00fablica-privada'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips114','Sistema de Tribunales de Inversiones'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips116','European Commission'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips118','Union europ\u00e9enne'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips119','Uni\u00f3n Europea'); <\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On March 30, 2023, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued its judgment on the merits in a case closely watched by the investment law community. The case concerned the [&hellip;]<script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips114','Sistema de Tribunales de Inversiones'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips118','Union europ\u00e9enne'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips119','Uni\u00f3n Europea'); <\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":26,"featured_media":15869,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[397],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/26"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9257"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9257\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}