{"id":4864,"date":"2017-12-21T08:24:43","date_gmt":"2017-12-21T14:24:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/?p=4864"},"modified":"2024-08-09T18:28:14","modified_gmt":"2024-08-09T16:28:14","slug":"adjudicator-compensation-systems-and-investor-state-dispute-settlement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/2017\/12\/21\/adjudicator-compensation-systems-and-investor-state-dispute-settlement\/","title":{"rendered":"Adjudicator Compensation Systems and Investor\u2013State Dispute Settlement"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>By David Gaukrodger, Published by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (<span class='tooltipsall tooltipsincontent classtoolTips44'>OECD<\/span>) Working Papers on International Investment, November 2017<\/h3>\n<p>Compensation for adjudicators is generally considered a core issue for judicial independence and for attracting good judges in the institutional design for courts. This paper examines compensation systems for adjudicators and dispute settlement administrators in investor\u2013state dispute settlement (<span class='tooltipsall tooltipsincontent classtoolTips43'>ISDS<\/span>). Comparing approaches in domestic courts in advanced economies, it provides historical context and examines remuneration reform for judges, from private fees to salaries, in the 18th and early 19th centuries. It also addresses the impacts of compensation systems on adjudicators; contemporary approaches to the compensation of judges in advanced economies; and the co-existence in advanced economies of national courts with salaried judges since the early 19th century with generally strong support for commercial arbitration based on ad hoc fee-based remuneration. It compares commercial arbitration and investment arbitration, focusing on the different effects and perceptions of largely similar compensation systems. Available at <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1787\/c2890bd5-en\">http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1787\/c2890bd5-en<\/a><!--more--><\/p>\n<script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips35','Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership<!--more-->'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips36','Partenariat \u00e9conomique r\u00e9gional global'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips37','Asociaci\u00f3n Econ\u00f3mica Integral Regional'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips43','investor\u2013state dispute settlement'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips44','Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips58','soluci\u00f3n de controversias inversionista-Estado'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips63','Bilateral investment treaty'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips67','Energy Charter Treaty'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips76','multilateral investment court'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips100','investissement direct \u00e9tranger'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips106','asociaci\u00f3n p\u00fablica-privada'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips110','inversi\u00f3n extranjera directa'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips114','Sistema de Tribunales de Inversiones'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips116','European Commission'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips118','Union europ\u00e9enne'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips119','Uni\u00f3n Europea'); <\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This paper examines compensation systems for adjudicators and dispute settlement administrators in investor\u2013state dispute settlement (<span class='tooltipsall tooltipsincontent classtoolTips43'>ISDS<\/span>).<script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips43','investor\u2013state dispute settlement'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips58','soluci\u00f3n de controversias inversionista-Estado'); <\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":15869,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[417],"tags":[1960,1925,1914],"class_list":["post-4864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-resources","tag-arbitrator-independence","tag-investor-state-dispute-settlement-isds","tag-oecd"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4864\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}