{"id":470,"date":"2010-03-16T11:11:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-16T16:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itn.mattrock.ca\/2010\/03\/16\/news-update-ny-judge-dismisses-ecuador-request-for-stay-of-chevron-arbitration-3\/"},"modified":"2013-01-23T08:22:41","modified_gmt":"2013-01-23T14:22:41","slug":"news-update-ny-judge-dismisses-ecuador-request-for-stay-of-chevron-arbitration-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/2010\/03\/16\/news-update-ny-judge-dismisses-ecuador-request-for-stay-of-chevron-arbitration-3\/","title":{"rendered":"NEWS UPDATE: NY Judge dismisses Ecuador request for stay of Chevron arbitration"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\"><strong>By Fernando Cabrera Diaz <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\"><strong>March 16, 2010<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Judge Leonard Sand of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has granted Chevron\u2019s motion to dismiss Ecuador\u2019s request to stay the company\u2019s arbitration against the Andean nation at the Court of Arbitration in The Hague.\u00a0 In his March 11 ruling, Judge Sand held that there was at least one arbitrable issue raised in the Chevron claim which prevented him from staying the arbitration.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">As reported previously by <span class='tooltipsall tooltipsincontent classtoolTips60'>ITN<\/span>, Chevron filed for arbitration against Ecuador in September of 2009, arguing that the country had violated the Ecuador-U.S. Bilateral Investment Treaty by, among other things, interfering on behalf of plaintiffs in a class-action suit against the company currently being disputed in Ecuador.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">In that class-action suit, a group of Ecuadorean citizens is suing Chevron over environmental damage allegedly caused by Texaco Inc., which was bought by Chevron in 2001, in the Lago Argrio region of Ecuador where Texaco participated in oil projects with the Ecuadorean government and Petroecuador until 1992.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">In response to Chevron\u2019s arbitration, Ecuador and the Lago Agrio claimants separately asked the U.S. District Court to stay the arbitration. Both parties argued that during a previous lawsuit over the environmental damage in Lago Agrio, Texaco had promise the same court that it would abide by any ruling in Ecuador in order to have the case moved to Ecuador. Chevorn moved quickly to dismiss both requests.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">In granting Chevron\u2019s motion, Judge Sand said he would assume without deciding that his Court had the power to stay an arbitration under certain circumstances.\u00a0 Judge Sand noted that the Court was divided on the issue, citing two recent cases which took opposite views as to whether the District Court had the power to stay an arbitration.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">What is settled law in New York, according to Judge Sand, is that if there is at least one arbitrable issue, the Court should not intervene in an arbitration. In the case at bar, the Judge found that there was at least one arbitrable issue raised by Chevron in its arbitration at The Hague.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">In particular the Judge pointed to Chevron&#8217;s claim that two Chevron lawyers were inappropriately criminally indicted and sanctioned and that this entitles the company to &#8220;moral damages&#8221; as a result of President Correa his government&#8217;s public campaign against the company.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Sources:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Transcript of Judge Sand\u2019s decision provided by Chevron Inc.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Previous ITN reporting:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">\u201cEcuadorians battle Chevron in U.S. court over <span class='tooltipsall tooltipsincontent classtoolTips63'>BIT<\/span> arbitration in long-running environmental damage dispute,\u201d By Fernando Cabrera Diaz, Investment Treaty News, 11 March 2010, available here:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.investmenttreatynews.org\/cms\/news\/archive\/2010\/03\/10\/ecuadorians-battle-chevron-in-u-s-court-over-bit-arbitration-in-long-running-environmental-damage-dispute.aspx\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">http:\/\/www.investmenttreatynews.org\/cms\/news\/archive\/2010\/03\/10\/ecuadorians-battle-chevron-in-u-s-court-over-bit-arbitration-in-long-running-environmental-damage-dispute.aspx<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">\u201cChevron launches investment-treaty claim against Ecuador,\u201d By By Damon Vis-Dunbar, Investment Treaty News, 2 October 2009, available here:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.investmenttreatynews.org\/cms\/news\/archive\/2009\/10\/01\/chevron-claims-denial-of-justice-in-investment-treaty-claim-against-ecuador.aspx\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">http:\/\/www.investmenttreatynews.org\/cms\/news\/archive\/2009\/10\/01\/chevron-claims-denial-of-justice-in-investment-treaty-claim-against-ecuador.aspx<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">\u201cChevron warns Ecuador on BIT claim as contract and environmental disputes persist\u201d, By Damon Vis-Dunbar, Investment Treaty News, 26 July 2006, available here:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.iisd.org\/pdf\/2006\/itn_july26_2006.pdf\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">http:\/\/www.<span class='tooltipsall tooltipsincontent classtoolTips32'>IISD<\/span>.org\/pdf\/2006\/itn_july26_2006.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips32','International Institute for Sustainable Development<!--more-->'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips33','Institut international du d\u00e9veloppement durable'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips34','Instituto Internacional para el Desarrollo Sostenible'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips60','Investment Treaty News'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips63','Bilateral investment treaty'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips67','Energy Charter Treaty'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips100','investissement direct \u00e9tranger'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips104','responsabilit\u00e9 sociale des entreprises'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips106','asociaci\u00f3n p\u00fablica-privada'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips114','Sistema de Tribunales de Inversiones'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips116','European Commission'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips118','Union europ\u00e9enne'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips119','Uni\u00f3n Europea'); <\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Fernando Cabrera Diaz March 16, 2010 Judge Leonard Sand of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has granted Chevron\u2019s motion to dismiss Ecuador\u2019s request [&hellip;]<script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips116','European Commission'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips118','Union europ\u00e9enne'); <\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> toolTips('.classtoolTips119','Uni\u00f3n Europea'); <\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":15869,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1984,2085],"class_list":["post-470","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-itn","tag-fair-and-equitable-treatment-fet","tag-natural-resources"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/470","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=470"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/470\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=470"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=470"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}