WTO Members, Not the Appellate Body, Need to Clarify Boundaries in Renewable Energy Support
What constitutes appropriate state measures for incentivizing renewable energy development and deployment?
This key question has been posed, not only by the sustainable development community, but even more so by governments and investors around the world. On May 6, 2013, all eyes were focused on the Appellate Body (AB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO), which gave its first ruling on measures affecting the renewable energy generation sector as part of a dispute brought by Japan and the European Union against Canada (Ontario). However, the AB ruling failed to provide legal clarification and interpretation of WTO rules related to sustainable energy. At the same time, parts of its analysis may have created a broad and potentially problematic carve-out of the subsidy agreement. This commentary analyzes what this ruling meant for the legal status of feed-in tariffs, and argues that WTO members, and not the AB, should clarify boundaries in renewable energy support.
You might also be interested in
Should Governments Subsidize Hydrogen?
As countries chart paths to net-zero economies, hydrogen is in the spotlight. Here are the risks and opportunities involved in subsidizing it.
Greener air travel will depend on these emerging technologies
Electric engines, alternative fuels, and better navigation could reduce emissions—and mitigate the impacts of a global return to the skies.
Only a far-reaching climate plan will transform the Canadian economy
As hope for the end of the COVID-19 pandemic grows, the Liberal government will increasingly turn its attention to recovery, and its promise to make climate change a central focus.
Canada needs to deliver to stem climate change
With Canada warming at twice the rate of the rest of the world—and three times the global rate across Northern Canada—climate impacts will intensify and multiply.