Meeting Canada's Subsidy Phase-Out Goal: What it means in Ontario
In May 2016 the Government of Canada, along with other G-7 countries, committed to a much needed timeline to phase out fossil fuel subsidies.
These countries committed to ending fossil fuel subsidies by 2025, attaching a specific year to the previous commitments to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels.
We have a good picture of the scale of this task at the national level in Canada from a recent IISD/ODI/OCI report, G-20 Subsidies to Oil, Gas and Coal Production: Canada. In this report, we identified CAD 2.9 billion in national subsidies for fossil fuel production.
This, however, is only part of the story. In an effort to better communicate the full scale of what it means for Canada to eliminate fossil fuel subsidies, IISD will be taking a look at both production and consumption subsidies through a series of briefing notes, along with a consideration of where action is already taking place and where more can be taken.
We start this examination with Canada’s most heavily populated province, Ontario. Phasing out the use of coal and setting a price on carbon are two major accomplishments in Ontario, but there is a third one needed for a truly low-carbon future for the province and for Canada as a whole. This is the removal of environmentally harmful subsidies that support production and consumption of fossil fuels.
This commentary highlights some of the prominent subsidies in place in Ontario that give preferential tax treatment to the use of fossil fuels, and examines how Ontario stacks up against other provinces.
You might also be interested in
Stop using taxpayers' money to fund pollution
In May, The WHO released its “Manifesto for a healthy and green COVID-19 recovery.” It is in many ways an astonishing document, because it speaks briefly and plainly to the many global problems we face.
Canada's Pandemic Response Sends $16 Billion to Fossils, Just $300 Million to Clean Energy
Canada’s pandemic response to date has sent just C$300 million to clean energy, compared to more than $16 billion to fossil fuels, according to new data released this week by Energy Policy Tracker
True recovery means looking to the future, not the past
The global call for a just, green recovery from COVID-19 will require planning for the short and long term. One immediate need is to stop subsidizing the polluting, climate-altering fossil fuel industry.
We, the people, should demand green strings attached
Prospects for nearly half of the world’s projects to build infrastructure for exporting LNG have faltered amid rising concerns about climate change, public protests and delays due to the coronavirus pandemic.