Negotiating item that caused agenda fight at COP 29 continues to draw divergent views
A key negotiating item that delayed the adoption of the agenda on day one of COP 29 to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change continues to draw divergent views from countries. The divergence in views is largely about the mandate of the United Arab Emirates dialogue on implementing the global stocktake outcomes.
You might also be interested in
Fisheries Subsidies and Sustainability: What's at stake for Senegal?
In this interview, Senegalese expert Mamadou Diallo discusses the risk of overfishing and its impact on coastal communities, highlighting the importance of Senegal ratifying and implementing the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies.
Fisheries Subsidies and the WTO: How far have we come?
Tristan Irschlinger offers a comprehensive overview explaining key aspects of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies, ongoing discussions, and what’s at stake for the sustainability of global fisheries.
WTO Members: Don't abandon the race—finish negotiations on fisheries subsidies
Anna Holl Buhl and Megan Jungwiwattanaporn explain why broader rules are needed to phase out subsidies that incentivize overfishing, harm marine life, and threaten the communities that depend on them.
Government Support to Fisheries: Why should we care?
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) Claire Delpeuch, Will Symes, and James Innes explain why, when implemented, public support policies should be environmentally sustainable, economically viable, and socially inclusive, and share insights on how that objective can be met.