English Français

Key Message

Investment agreements are rife with implications for a wide range of issues: water, human rights, climate change and others. A holistic appreciation of potentially serious consequences is necessary to ensure that investment agreements do not end up impeding human welfare and sustainable development.

Investment and SD: Cross-cutting Issues

Investment and Sustainable Development

Re-thinking climate change as a sustainable investment regime

The international debate on investment rules has tended to assume a “natural” progression from bilateral to regional to broad multilateral rules. As the weaknesses of this progression become clearer from a sustainable development perspective, IISD believes that an alternative approach should also be considered. This would be to embed investment rules in environmental and other public goods-oriented agreements.

This approach has, in fact, been used twice to date; in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and in the Energy Charter Treaty. Both sought to promote other goals—increased access of services and to energy—by providing clearer rights to foreign investors in these sectors. The Kyoto Protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is an obvious candidate for the addition of investment rules designed to promote sustainable energy investment.

IISD can foresee the climate change regime evolving, at least in part, into an investment regime, aimed at stimulating investment in technology renewal and industrial transformation with a view to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Investment and international human rights

IISD is seeking to create partnerships that will bring the human rights and investment law communities together.

Initial research undertaken by IISD, with the sponsorship of the Swiss Department of Foreign Affairs, has shown how little forethought has gone into the relationship between the international human rights regime and the international investment regime. Further research and analysis is needed to identify the most constructive methods by which the twin goals of investor protection and human rights promotion and protection, may be made mutually compatible at the international level. In addition, some national law cases concerning the human rights practices of foreign investors abroad highlight the need for the conduct of foreign investors themselves to be better informed by human rights law and principles.

Further Reading