| About Di Digest | Back Issues | Mailing List | Email DI | On Line Features | 1
| 2
| 3 |
4
| 5
| LitScan TrendWatch |
5. |
Life Time |
|
An intriguing new area of intellectual exploration is opening up at the
intersection of Sustainable Development and Time. This August, for example, an
eminent group of thinkers will gather to discuss the 'temporal dynamics of
unsustainability' at their annual meeting. The Balaton Group which
includes eminent theorists like Dennis and Donella Meadows of Limits to Growth
fame, may do well to look at how different time scales for decision-making can
help or hinder SD. It may be, for example, that some decisions and actions need
to 'speed up' (e.g. on global poverty eradication or environmental technology
transfers to China), while others need to 'slow down' (e.g. on the
over-consumption of natural resources). But the situation is complicated by the
fact that life times or cycles vary enormously depending on whether you are
looking at animals, plants, products, human beings, ecosystems, soils or
minerals. Greater clarity is needed in deciding how to measure the effects of
one on the other in a meaningful way particularly of human impacts on the
other variables. As a busy individual, you may choose to 'slow down' your
lifestyle for purely personal or health reasons like stress reduction or
improved family time. Of course, if societies have too many high-speed,
stressed-out individuals, quality of life suffers and something has to give. A
recent report called Sustainable Germany advocates shorter work weeks and
reduced resource consumption as a central strategy for a more secure social,
ecological and economic future. Cultural traditions can help weave more
sustainable lifestyles into the fabric of civilizations. The traditional Native
American decision-making time horizon of 'seven generations' or about 250 years,
for example, establishes a strong link between decisions made today and their
impacts on future generations. We wish the Balaton Group and other thinkers
success in unravelling the threads that link Time and SD.
[appropriate time scales for sustainable decision-making]
| |
| Movement for Slow Food The whimsically-named 'Movement for Slow Food' refers not to a new-fangled Philip Glass composition but to a popular movement to increase the quality of life by decreasing the pace of modern life. Slow Food was launched in Italy when McDonald's brought fast food to Rome. The movement which now claims 40,000 members in 40 countries shows that many individuals are rethinking their allegiance to a 'faster-is-better' mindset. | |
| movement for slow food n. the slow-down
movement which began in Italy and has now gone international selective slowness n. the conscious slowing down of certain aspects of our lives, such as mealtimes, evenings or weekends revenge effect n. the unforeseen and time-consuming demands of new, ostensibly time-saving technology | |
| Driver, Thackeray and Chapman, Graham P. Time Scales and Environmental
Change. London: Routledge, 1996. 275p.
Tenner, Edward. Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996. 346p. Wuppertal Institute. Sustainable Germany: a Contribution to Sustainable Global Development. Wuppertal, Germany: Wuppertal Institute, 1995. |