
- Explore similarities and differences between countries
- Question whether adaptive strategies have been identified
that really can lead to sustainable livelihoods
- Consider community follow-up activities
- Review policy recommendations
- Synthesize recommendations for consideration at the international
level.
![[Stg1]](../webgfx/st1.GIF) ![[Stg2]](../webgfx/st2.GIF) ![[Stg3]](../webgfx/st3.GIF) ![[Stg4]](../webgfx/st4.GIF) ![[Stg5]](../webgfx/st5.GIF) ![[Stg6]](../webgfx/lit6.GIF) ![[Stg7]](../webgfx/st7.GIF)
|
Stage 6: Second international workshop
At some stage, between the preparation of the draft outputs
and their finalization, there should be a second international
workshop. The purpose of this workshop is to consolidate and compare
conclusions, to cross-fertilize ideas and interpretations, and
to synthesize cross-national policy issues.
This workshop could well be held in one of the project countries,
providing the opportunity for field visits. At least one and preferably
more than one member of the field teams, as well as the lead policy
analyst should attend, as should the advisory body. The IISD project
used this format with considerable success.
Care given to adequate lead time will be well repaid. Country
documents should be circulated sufficiently in advance of the
workshop for them to be read and discussed among the other country
teams as well as the project organizers. Good advance preparation
will allow workshop time to be used for substantive issues.
It is sufficiently important to get quality papers circulated
and considered in advance, that project organizers might wish
to consider some form of incentives or sanctions to encourage
performance in this respect.
|